Legal Opinion

Simonton v. Morton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 19PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Sci-iaeeEr,

Defendant is engaged in the business of erecting highway signboards and leasing space and painting signs thereon for advertisers. Plaintiff entered into the contract with him which appears above and while engaged in work on one of the signboards was injured. Claiming to be an employee of defendant, he began a compensation proceeding and an award was made in his favor, which was confirmed by the common pleas on appeal; as a result of the judgment there entered, defendant brings the record to us, setting up that plaintiff was not his employee but an independent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Smith v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Colleoni v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API