Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron Works
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Daniel Lambert, who was seriously injured when an industrial split-wheel owned by the defendant-appellant, Pittsburgh Bridge and Iron Works (hereinafter “P. B. & I.”), violently separated striking Lambert in the head.
P.B. & I. operates a business in Beaver County, in the course of which it uses forklift trucks in the stacking and transporting of equipment and supplies. Upon these forklifts are what are known as “split-wheels”, which may be physically described, as follows: the wheels are assembled in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saganowich v. HachikianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Thomas v. RibbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Wissman v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Ballinger v. Howell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Gouse v. CasselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Rose v. Miller & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Wright v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Donaldson v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.