Legal Opinion

Shuman Estate v. Weber

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1980No. 2490PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the court of common pleas granting appellee Thomas Mertz’ motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and directing judgment in his favor against appellant, the plaintiff below. Appellant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the court, by its order, substituted its judgment for that of the jury. We disagree and affirm the order.

It is hornbook law that in deciding a motion for judgment n. o. v., the court must consider the evidence, including all reasonable inferences deducible…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Cna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. P. Brian Brumfield v. Sherri Sanders Michelle Shadday Brenda Derr-Blakeney M. Jane Huff Carla Meyers United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Wuterich v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Nicole Chappell Joseph Powell, III Nicole ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured Claims v. Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (In Re Papercraft Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API