Legal Opinion
In Re Jackson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1994No. 94-BG-527PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent Jackson, a member of our bar, be suspended for six months for violating Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(4), which prohibits an attorney from engaging in “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.” A copy of the Board’s report and recommendation, in slightly edited form, is appended to this opinion. Before this court neither Mr. Jackson nor Bar Counsel has challenged the Board’s recommendation.
We conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence and that the proposed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re ScanioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.