Legal Opinion
In re Silva
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 2011No. Nos. 08-BG-82, 09-BG-1582PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Having found that respondent Theodore S. Silva, Jr., committed serious transgressions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including criminal acts and intentional dishonesty, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we suspend him from practicing law for a period of three years and require him to demonstrate his fitness as a condition of reinstatement. The Board’s report is appended to this opinion. Respondent and Bar Counsel take only limited exceptions to it. Neither party objects in any material respect to the Board’s factual findings or its…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Gilbert BaberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- F. Lee Bailey v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- In re PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.