Legal Opinion
In Re Kennedy
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1988No. 86-1268PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) found that the respondent Kennedy violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 3-101(B) 1 by engaging in the practice of law while under suspension and DR 1-102(A)(4) 2 by (1) failing to remit to his law firm a retainer fee received from a firm client, (2) instructing another client of the firm to send payment to his new office after he had left the firm, and (3) misrepresenting his current salary to the loan office of a savings and loan institution. The Board also found that the seriousness of the conduct and the need for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- District of Columbia Bar v. KleindienstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.