Scarboro v. Pilot Life Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is to the signing of the judgment. This presents one question for decision: whether the facts found by the Judge are sufficient to support the judgment. James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d 759; Glace v. Throwing Co., 239 N.C. 668, 80 S.E. 2d 759; Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 35 S.E. 2d 609.
There is neither finding of fact nor evidence, that the glider was “operated for any aviation training,” or that it was “maintained or operated for military or naval purposes.” Therefore, paragraphs (b) and (c) of the AviatioN ExolusioN Rider have no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of St. Paul v. TraegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Provident Life & Acc. Ins. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Lineberger v. Security Life & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.