Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The parties having agreed upon a statement of facts on which the case was submitted to the trial court, exception to the failure of the court to find other facts is not well taken. Hence exception to the judgment, and to the entry of it, assigned as error on this appeal presents for decision this question: Do the facts to which the parties agreed support the judgment? Culbreth v. Britt, 231 N.C. 76, 56 S.E. 2d 15, and cases cited. See also Duke v. Campbell, 233 N.C. 262, 63 S.E. 2d 555; In re Hall, 235 N.C. 697, 71 S.E. 2d 140, and cases cited. Also James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.