Legal Opinion

James v. Pretlow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1955No. 315PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Petitioner’s sole exception is to the signing of the judgment. Therefore, her assignment of error, based on this exception, presents one question for decision: whether the facts found by the Judge are sufficient to support the judgment. Warshaw v. Warshaw, 236 N.C. 754, 73 S.E. 2d 900; Glace v. Throwing Co., 239 N.C. 668, 80 S.E. 2d 759; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762; Donnell v. Cox, 240 N.C. 259, 81 S.E. 2d 664.

The judge’s findings of fact not having been excepted to “are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal.” Donnell v. Cox, supra.

Where one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harris v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Latham v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Morris v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. In Re TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Tyner v. TynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Watkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. In Re Custody of StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API