Bishop v. Bishop
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The defendant did not request the court to find the facts, or except to the findings made by it. Hardee v. Mitchell, 230 N.C. 40, 51 S.E. 2d 884. In fact, no exception was entered at the hearing below. However, the appeal itself constitutes an exception to the judgment. Cannon v. Wilmington, 242 N.C. 711, 89 S.E. 2d 595; Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; Gibson v. Insurance Co., 232 N.C. 712, 62 S.E. 2d 320. Therefore, the only question presented is whether the facts found are sufficient to support the judgment. Byrd v. Thompson, 243 N.C. 271, 90 S.E. 2d 394; Scarboro v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Story v. . StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.