Legal Opinion

Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1951No. 451PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnviN, J.

Motions to strike out separate parts of pleadings are sanctioned by this provision of the Code of Civil Procedure: “If irrelevant or redundant matter is inserted in a pleading, it may be stricken out on motion of any person aggrieved thereby, but this motion must be made before answer or demurrer, or before an extension of time to plead is granted.” G.S. 1-153.

Matter in a pleading is irrelevant within the purview of the statute if it has no substantial relation to the controversy between the parties in the particular action. Howell v. Ferguson, 87 N.C. 113.

No occasion arises in the instant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. George H. Gilbert Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Dustin v. CurtisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API