Legal Opinion

Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 170PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The rights and obligations of the parties are fixed by the insuring provision of the policy which .provides protection for liability resulting from: “The ownership, maintenance or use of the premises for the purpose of an automobile dealer, repair shop, service station, storage garage or public parking place, and all operations necessary or incidental thereto, and the ownership, maintenance or use of any automobile in connection with the above defined operations, and the occasional use for other business purposes and the use for non-business purposes of (1) any automobile owned by or in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Storm v. Town of Wrightsville BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. McLeod v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Volkswagen Ins. Co. v. Dung Ba NguyenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Wake County Hospital System, Inc. v. National Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API