Totten v. New York Life Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The sole issue in this petition for review is whether the term “any aircraft” in the exclusion clause of a life insurance policy includes a hang glider. We hold that a hang glider is included in the term “any aircraft.”
In May 1980, Dale Totten purchased an insurance policy from the defendant, New York Life Insurance Co., insuring his life in the face amount of $25,000. The policy also contained an accidental death benefit in the additional sum of $25,000. Dale Totten’s wife, Kristi A. Totten, was named the primary beneficiary.
On April 9,1982, Dale Totten died by drowning when the hang glider…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Botts v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Stanford v. American Guaranty Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Dewsnup v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.