Libby v. Conway
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HOYT, J., pro tem. *
This is an action for damages against a physician for malpractice. It was brought by the infant plaintiff by and through her mother, who was duly appointed her guardian ad litem. At the time of the trial plaintiff-appellant was about 3 years of age. She suffered from serious brain damage due either to congenital anomaly, damage at birth, or a combination of both. The trial court granted a nonsuit at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case.
At the outset we are confronted with the fact that appellant’s notice of appeal states that it is from the order denying plaintiff’s motion…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Weyburn v. California Kamloops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Estate of May v. ZormanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.