Hamasaki v. Flotho
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiff Toshio Hamasaki was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Fred Flotho, Jr. The latter was acting in the course of his employment by defendant Leland and was using the ear with the consent of its owner, defendant Fred Flotho, Sr. Toshio and his father brought this action to recover for injuries and medical expenses.
The accident occurred in a residential neighborhood while Toshio, who was then not quite 6 years of age, was crossing the street in the middle of the block. At the trial plaintiffs contended that the defendant driver was traveling at an excessive rate of speed and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.