Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
An order denying a motion for new trial is nonappealable. (Rodriguez v. Barnett (1959) 52 Cal.2d 154, 156 [338 P.2d 907] (Rodriguez).) Such an order, however, may be reviewed on appeal from the underlying judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 906; Hamasaki v. Flotho (1952) 39 Cal.2d 602, 608 [248 P.2d 910].) In this case, we must decide what should be done when a party’s notice of appeal states only that the appeal is from the order denying a new trial. Should the Court of Appeal summarily dismiss the appeal as being from a nonappealable order? Or should the Court of Appeal construe…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Howard Entertainment, Inc. v. KudrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.