Legal Opinion
Weyburn v. California Kamloops, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 1962No. Civ. 10223PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
The trial court, after plaintiff’s opening statement, granted defendants’ motion for a nonsuit both on the pleadings and on the opening statement. Our review of the pleadings and opening statement convinces us judgment of nonsuit was improper.
A digest of the allegations of the complaint shows defendant California Kamloops, Inc., a California corporation, which owned and operated lands on Shasta Lake as a sportsmen’s camp, invited plaintiff onto said lands and so negligently maintained, operated, and controlled said premises as to cause them to be dangerous and defective in that a metal pipe…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rovegno v. San Jose Knights of Columbus Hall Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Smith v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Wright v. Arcade School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Nuffer v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Galanek v. WismarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Palazzi v. Air Cargo Terminals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.