Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Stout

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2018No. CC 1101350CR; SC S064521PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

*569**760This case requires us to construe a pleading requirement that is unique to indictments charging a violation of the Oregon's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to 166.735. ORICO prohibits various forms of involvement with a "pattern of racketeering activity," including conspiring or endeavoring to participate in an "enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity." ORS 166.720(3) and (4). The legislature has specified that, when an indictment charging an ORICO violation contains "an allegation of a pattern of racketeering activity," the indictment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. OfodrinwaOregon Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Dept. of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. KygerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Nancy Doty, Inc. v. Wildcat Haven, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. MeiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API