Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Chubb

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1921No. Civ. No. 3276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an action to enforce the liability of certain stockholders in the Mont P. Chubb Drug Company. A general demurrer was interposed by the defendant, Mont P. Chubb, which was overruled. Thereupon an answer was filed. On the trial, the defendant introduced no evidence. The appeal is based upon the judgment-roll alone.

The action is upon two promissory notes. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff purchased them for a valuable consideration and before maturity, and it states the date upon which the notes were made but contains no allegation as to the date on which the original indebtedness…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Winona Wagon Co. v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Case Plow Works v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Brown v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. CochraneAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API