Hunt v. Ward
California Supreme Court
Appeal from .a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Action to recover of defendant Ward his proportionate share of the alleged indebtedness of a corporation in which he was a stockholder. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, said defendant appeals. Appellant contends, among other things, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the action is barred by section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It is averred in the complaint that on February 20,1888, a certain corporation called the “ Exchange Block Company” made and delivered to respondent its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Green v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by60 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.