Case Plow Works v. Montgomery
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This an action against a stockholder to recover his proportionate share of a corporate debt under section 322 of the Civil Code.
It is alleged in the complaint that on a certain day the corporation made, executed, and delivered to plaintiff its certain promissory note, which is then set out at length. *381In no other way is corporate indebtedness averred. The complaint sufficiently shows the amount of subscribed capital stock, and the amount of stock owned by defendant at the time the note was executed, and the only question involved on this appeal is whether this is a sufficient allegation that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Winona Wagon Co. v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- National City Bank v. ChubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Whitehurst v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900