Legal Opinion

Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1928No. Docket No. 6514PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The above action was brought by an assignee for collection to recover upon three promissory notes and an account for work and labor. The trial court found that the three notes, which were set forth in the first, second, and fourth causes of action in the complaint and dated, respectively, the first and twenty-third days of June, 1922, were executed for value received by Temple Hospital Association, Incorporated, a corporation, the several amounts thereof with the names of the payees and the dates when payable being as follows: the first note was for $25,000, payable sixty days after…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Harts v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wright v. Heizer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Wright v. Heizer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Merrill v. Normandie Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API