Winona Wagon Co. v. Bull
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
. Haynes, C.
Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, claiming that- the “ Bull & Grant F'arm Implement Co.,” a California corporation, was indebted to it in a large sum of money, brought its action against defendant Bull to enforce his liability as a stockholder in the latter corporation for his proportion of said indebtedness.
The cause was tried by the court, and plaintiff had judgment, but, being dissatisfied with the amount recovered, moved for a new trial, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion.
The complaint contained two counts upon a single cause of action, but upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Payne v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Trippe v. HuncheonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Kaysser v. McNaughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Goodall v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- O'Neill v. QuarnstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.