Legal Opinion

Brown v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1932No. Docket No. 8257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, W. F. Ball, from a judgment against him based upon the stockholders ’ liability formerly provided for in section 322 of the Civil Code before its amendment in 1931. The plaintiff sued and recovered judgment as assignee of thirty-two separate creditors of Bartlett Music Company, a California corporation. The court found that at the time the indebtednesses sued upon were created appellant was the owner of 776 shares of the stock of such corporation out of 1720 then subscribed and gave judgment against appellant on that basis for $9,269.32.

Appe…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hyman v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API