Legal Opinion
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 12, 2001No. C5-99-1383PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Respondent BCBSM, Inc., d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (hereinafter BCBSM) initiated legal proceedings against Philip Morris, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, B.A.T. Industries P.L.C., Lorillard Tobacco Company, The American Tobacco Company, Liggett Group, Inc., The Council for Tobacco Researeh-U.S.A., Inc., and The Tobacco Institute, Inc. in 1994 alleging that as a result of the unlawful conduct of the tobacco companies, BCBSM has been damaged by paying substantially higher claims to its contracted health…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas UtilitiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.