Legal Opinion
Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1986No. C5-84-875, C9-84-913, CO-84-914, C8-84-921 and C6-84-934PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
The six taconite producers served by Peoples Natural Gas Company — The Hanna Mining Company, Erie Mining Company, Hibbing Taconite Joint Venture, United States Steel Corporation (USS), Eveleth Taconite Company, and Reserve Mining Company — challenge the schedule of interim rates authorized by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) during the pendency of Peoples’ petition for increased rates and MPUC’s refund plan, asserting that they do not comport with the provisions of Minn.Stat. § 216B.16 (1984) and are violative of due process. The court of appeals affirmed. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Petition of Peoples Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. NovakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by24 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Application of Crown CoCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Continental Telephone Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Petition of Inter-City Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.