Legal Opinion
Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1983No. C4-82-1494PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This case comes before the court for a second time. See Hibbing Taconite Co. v. Minnesota Public Service Commission, 302 N.W.2d 5 (Minn.1980) (hereinafter Hibbing Taconite). On remand from that decision, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) issued an order reaffirming its original conclusion allowing Minnesota Power & Light Company (MPL) a return on common equity of 13 percent. MPL appealed from that order to the district court. The district court reversed and remanded the case for the PUC to establish MPL’s return on common equity at a figure greater than 13…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary, Department of Labor, Environmentaldefense Fund, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Washington Public Interest Organization v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hibbing Taconite Co. v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.