Legal Opinion
Bird v. State, Department of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 8, 1985No. C5-85-756PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment determining that the cancellation of appellants’ used automobile dealer’s license without notice and a hearing was a discretionary act, and that the respondents were therefore immune from suit pursuant to the Tort Claims Act, Minn.Stat. § 3.736 (1984). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for trial.
FACTS
Appellants Frances and Irving Bird reside in International Falls, Minnesota and own a used automobile dealership known as Second Bridge Auto Sales. In November 1983, Irving applied to the Department of Public Safety…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Riehm v. EngelkingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.