Legal Opinion
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 2002No. C6-01-96PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
Respondent Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) brought a declaratory judgment action in district court seeking an order requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 116D.04, subd. 2(a) (2000), on Appellant Boise Cascade Corporation’s proposed Efficiency Improvement Project.1 Appellant Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), as the responsible governmental unit (RGU), concluded that the proposed project did not have the potential for significant environmental effects and therefore an EIS was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- National Audubon Society v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
3Cited by50 opinions
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas UtilitiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.