Legal Opinion

Elconin v. Yalen

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 11918PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this action, brought by plaintiff to recover fees alleged to be due for services rendered by him as an attorney at law on behalf of defendants in the matter of negotiating for settlement or instituting and prosecuting a suit on account of certain personal injuries and damages sustained by defendant William Yalen, the judgment is hereby affirmed. In the following statement of the ease may be found the ground upon which we base our conclusion:

Plaintiff, by the first count of his amended complaint, alleged an oral contract with defendants whereby he was to render all necessary services for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API