Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Kinsler
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
The pertinent facts herein appear to be that following a personal injury which theretofore she had sustained in an accident, the defendant Mrs. Anna Kinsler, employed the defendant Eversole as an attorney at law to bring an action for the purpose of recovering a judgment against the person who was asserted to have been negligent in having-caused said accident to occur. By the terms of the said contract, the compensation therein provided to be paid to said Eversole was contingent and, in effect, provided that the latter was to be paid for the services which he thereafter might render to Mrs.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Lally v. KusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.