Legal Opinion

Denio v. City of Huntington Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1943No. L. A. 18172PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant city of Huntington Beach appeals from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, awarding to plaintiffs $2,000 as attorneys’ fees for services rendered to defendant under a written contract between the parties. After plaintiffs had partially performed the services called for by the contract, defendant city discharged them. The city now seeks to justify such discharge on the ground that the contract was ultra vires and void in its inception, and on the further ground that plaintiffs had abandoned the contract prior to such discharge. The city also asserts that plaintiffs have not shown…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Work v. United States Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
  5. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API