Legal Opinion

Gage v. Atwater

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1902No. L.A. No. 1009PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The above-named appellant appeared as the attorney of record for W. E. Atwater and Gratia H. Atwater, his wife, who were defendants in the above action of ejectment herein brought against them by the above-named Matthew Gage, and filed an answer in their behalf, and conducted their defense upon the trial of the cause. The court rendered its decision in the action June 29, 1899, and judgment thereon was entered in favor of the plaintiff July 17th. July 6, 1899, the defendants Atwater gave to the appellant notice that they would apply to the superior court upon a day therein named for an order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People's Home Savings Bank v. Superior Court of the City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ex parte KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Russel v. ConwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. People ex rel. Downer v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Mansfield v. DorlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API