State v. Flohr
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
James P. Flohr, Sr., was convicted of delivery of an alcoholic beverage to a minor, (§ 5-01-09, NDCC). 1 We affirm.
The case was tried to a jury in the Stark County Court With Increased Jurisdiction. Flohr seeks a new trial for the reasons that: (1) he was prejudiced by the calculated misconduct of the prosecutor; (2) there was insufficient evidence upon which reasonable men could base a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) he was fined excessively in violation of Article I, Section 11, of the North Dakota Constitution.
Testimony was received which shows that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. OlmsteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. His ChaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.