Legal Opinion
State v. Gibbs
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 2009No. 20070378PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Moe Maurice Gibbs appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of murder. Gibbs argues (1) the State failed to provide him with adequate financial resources for necessary experts for his defense, (2) the prosecution’s statements during the State’s casein-chief and during closing arguments constituted improper comment on his right not to testify, (3) the district court’s refusal to allow the jury to hear and see law enforcement’s pre-arrest videotaped interview of him violated the doctrine of completeness and (4) the State failed to introduce…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StridironNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Interest of N.C.M., D.C.M., and J.J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WilderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Interest of A.B., a ChildNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.