Legal Opinion

Griffin v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1965No. 202PublishedCited by 4,305 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree after a jury trial in the California court. He did not testify at the trial on the issue of guilt, though he did testify at the separate trial1 on the issue of penalty. The trial court instructed the jury on the issue of guilt, stating that a defend*128ant has a constitutional right not to testify. But it told the jury:2

“As to any evidence or facts against him which the defendant can reasonably be expected to deny or explain because of facts within his knowledge, if he does not testify, he fails to deny or explain such evidence, the jury may…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,305 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

4,300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API