Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1975No. Crim. 524PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Merle Gene Allen (hereinafter Gene) appeals from a jury verdict of guilty and from the judgment on conviction of the District Court of Stutsman County finding him guilty of burglary. He asks that his conviction be reversed or that a new trial be granted.
At the close of the prosecution’s case, Gene moved for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29(a), N.D.R.Crim.P., which'motion was denied. He did not renew his motion after he had presented his case nor did he petition the trial court for a new trial.
Gene asserts on appeal that his motion for judgment of acquittal…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. AshkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Russell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.