Legal Opinion

State v. Olmstead

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1976No. Cr. 553PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Justice.

This case presented the trial judge with a direct conflict between the uncorroborated identification of the defendant as her assailant by a rape victim, and an alibi defense supported by five witnesses. The trial judge believed the victim and found the defendant guilty, in a trial without a jury. The defendant appealed, asserting that the evidence as a matter of law was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We affirm the conviction, but find error in the court’s refusal to permit the reinstatement of a withdrawn motion for new trial, and we remand for consideration of that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ElmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. ChampagneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kresel v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KaloustianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. NesetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Houle v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. McMorrowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. SaavedraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API