State v. Myers
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Daniel Myers appealed from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of three drug-related offenses. We conclude the prosecutor’s closing argument did not violate Myers’s right against self-incrimination, the district court’s failure to admonish the jury before a recess was not reversible error, and there was sufficient evidence to convict Myers of the three offenses. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In late March 2003, Bismarck police were investigating a drug transaction based upon information received from a confidential informant. The information concerned a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. NordquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StensakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.