Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2006No. 20050368PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Myers appealed from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of three drug-related offenses. We conclude the prosecutor’s closing argument did not violate Myers’s right against self-incrimination, the district court’s failure to admonish the jury before a recess was not reversible error, and there was sufficient evidence to convict Myers of the three offenses. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In late March 2003, Bismarck police were investigating a drug transaction based upon information received from a confidential informant. The information concerned a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. NordquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. StensakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API