Legal Opinion

Bakewell v. Bakewell

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1942No. L. A. 18422PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShbnk, J.

— This is a petition by the defendant for the writ of supersedeas to stay the effect of a judgment pending his appeal. The judgment is entitled “JUDGMENT (Interlocutory).” If it is, in truth, an interlocutory judgment, an appeal therefrom does not lie and the petitioner is not entitled to the writ.

In May, 1942, after a partial hearing, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and rendered a judg ment which, as stated, was called an interlocutory judgment. The conclusions of law and judgment include intermingled statements of fact and conclusions of law, but the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API