Legal Opinion

Logoluso v. Logoluso

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1965No. Civ. 362PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This appeal is from a judgment ordering a sale of assets in a proceeding for dissolution of a copartnership engaged in farming. All of the partnership property, both real and personal, was ordered sold as a unit. Appellants attack that part of the judgment ordering the real property sold as a unit, contending that the court erred in not approving a division in kind made by the partners.

The five Logoluso brothers, under the terms of a written copartnership agreement, owned and farmed 12 parcels of real property valued by the court at $2,000,000, subject to encumbrances of about $166,700. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treu v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Wood v. GuntherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Harper v. LampingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Pilch v. MilikinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Creel v. LillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Maras v. StilinovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. McCormick v. BrevigMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. First National Bank of Kenosha v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API