Legal Opinion

Kinoshita v. Horio

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1986No. A029509PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

186 Cal.App.3d 959 (1986)

231 Cal. Rptr. 241

SHIGEO KINOSHITA, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent,

v.

TOSHIO HORIO, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; MICHIKO HORIO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. A029509.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

October 30, 1986.

COUNSEL

Bland W. Cannon, Jr., for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant and for Defendants and Appellants.

John J. Murphy for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SABRAW, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment directing the dissolution of a partnership and sale of its assets.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Kurwa v. KislingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API