Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Metz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1987No. 82 Civ. 3171 (SWK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAM, District Judge.
Subject matter jurisdiction in this case is founded on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) brought the primary action to seek injunctive relief and damages for interference with its right of way caused by certain construction work performed on the adjacent properties of defendants Robert and Elizabeth Metz (the “Metz defendants”) and C. Hugh Hildesley (“Hildesley”). After an order of settlement with Hildesley was entered in April 1983, plaintiff moved for summary judgment against the Metz defendants and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Old Republic Insurance v. Concast, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- E. F. Hutton & Co. v. Jupiter Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Oliner v. McBride's Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Paving Systems, Inc. v. Van-Tulco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Gross v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Ibasis Global, Inc. v. Diamond Phone Card, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Falcone v. MarineMax, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.