Legal Opinion
Oliner v. McBride's Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1985No. 72 Civ. 4613 (CHT)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(f) for an order dismissing seven of the affirmative defenses asserted by the defendant, Zsa Zsa Gabor (“Gabor”). In turn, Gabor, the only remaining defendant in this action, has moved, pursuant to Rule 14(a), for leave to serve and file a third-party complaint naming four third-party defendants. Both the *17plaintiff and defendant have moved for costs and counsel fees under Rule 11. For the reasons set forth below, each of these motions is denied.1
The underlying action was commenced in 1972 by Jacob…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re Zsa Zsa LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LorinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. HardageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
- Estee Lauder, Inc. v. Fragrance Counter, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- National Bank of Canada v. Artex Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ToomeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.