Legal Opinion
Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1999No. CV 95-3653(ADS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The motions presently before the Court present a novel issue in this Circuit. Namely, whether an employer being sued for age discrimination, based partly upon the terms of a Collective Bargaining Agreement and a Performance Planning and Evaluation Program, may seek contribution from the union that was a party to those labor agreements. For the reasons stated in this decision, the Court is of the view that the New York Human Rights Law provides a basis for such contribution.
I. BACKGROUND
Unless otherwise stated, the following facts are not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Alvin Joel TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Howard University v. WatkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Thomas v. EDI Specialists, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Firestone v. BerriosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Too, Inc. v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.