Legal Opinion

International Paving Systems, Inc. v. Van-Tulco, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 11, 1994No. 88-CV-1066 (DRH)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

In these consolidated cases regarding the rights and obligations of the parties to several contracts for the renovation of the St. George Ferry Terminal in Staten Island, New York, the parties have moved for various forms of pre-trial relief, including summary judgment, amendment of the complaints, and impleader of additional parties. For the reasons set forth below, these motions are denied in part and granted in part.

Background

In June of 1983, the City of New York (the “City”) entered into a contract with Berger, Lehman Associates, P.C. (“Berger…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bank of India v. Trendi Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Pfizer, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  4. Ibasis Global, Inc. v. Diamond Phone Card, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  5. Falcone v. MarineMax, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API