Legal Opinion
Old Republic Insurance v. Concast, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1983No. 83 Civ. 0986 (RLC)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
The issue to be decided here on motion of third-party defendant Fred S. James & Co. of New York (“James”) involves the proper standard for impleading a third-party defendant under F.R.Civ.P. 14(a) in the context of a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff in the main action, Old'Republic Insurance Co. (“Old Republic”), a company carrying excess insurance, sued Concast, Inc. (“Concast”), Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (“SHI”) and Federal Insurance Company for a declaratory judgment that its insurance policy with Concast does not provide coverage to SHI.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Solomon Angel v. Seattle-First National Bank, and Third Party v. United States of America, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United of Omaha Life Insurance v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Forum Insurance v. Ranger InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- State College Area School District v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Gross v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. MetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.