In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Laury
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue is whether, for commingling and eventually converting to his own use the funds of his clients, the accused should be suspended from the practice of law rather than being disbarred. The accused contends that disbarment is not a proper sanction because of the accused’s alcohol dependency during the period in which the commingling and conversion occurred. We hold that he must be disbarred.
The Oregon State Bar (Bar) filed a formal complaint containing three causes, and the complaint and notice to answer were served on the accused on November 13, 1984. Despite the fact that both the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobesonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.