Legal Opinion

Keener v. Beal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1957No. 171PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant offered evidence. He assigns as error the refusal of the court to allow his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183; White v. Lacey, 245 N.C. 364, 96 S.E. 2d 1. The defendant in his brief contends that plaintiff should have been nonsuited on the ground of contributory negligence, for the reason that plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout, and “was operating his automobile in the nighttime with headlights which were markedly below the statutory standard.” The defendant says in his brief he has not argued the absence of negligence on the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API