Bondurant v. Mastin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The three defendants filed a joint answer, in which it is admitted that defendant John Mastin does business under the name of both Holland, Mastin and Sale Company and of H. M. & S. Refrigerated Service, of which he is sole owner. The answer also alleges that defendant John Mastin was engaged in the business of transportation by tractors and trailers of commodities and foodstuffs, and on 16 November 1958 Holland, Mastin and Sale Company was the registered owner of a 1956 Mack tractor and John Mastin was the registered owner of a 1955 Mack tractor. The answer also admits that at the times…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Johnson v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Pruett v. InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.